Countries fail to agree on size of fund to fight climate change ahead of Cop29 summit
The Deliver As Target Tool Reduce Such Climate That Projects Energy Can Or The To Warming Carbon New Talks Core Fund Emissions That Low Financing Renewable Planet Global Transport Is —
With just five months to go before this year's UN climate summit, countries cannot agree on the size of a global funding bill to help the developing world fight climate change — let alone how to split it.
The decision is set to dominate the Cop29 climate talks in Azerbaijan in November, where nearly 200 countries need to agree on a new annual financing target for helping poorer countries cut their emissions and protect their societies in a harsher, hotter world.
The new target will replace the yearly $100bn that rich countries had pledged in climate finance from 2020. That goal was met two years late.
But preliminary talks this week in Bonn, Germany, have yielded no major breakthroughs. Instead, the talks ending on Thursday have again exposed the unyielding rifts among the world's biggest economies over who should be paying most to fight climate change — and how much.
Representatives from climate-vulnerable nations said it was hard watching wealthy nations fall late with past payments of climate finance while quickly approving new funds for military responses to war or spending billions subsidising CO2-emitting energy sources.
CLIMATE & SUSTAINABILITY HUB
"It seems like money is always there when it's a more 'real' national priority for the country," Michai Robertson, negotiator for the Alliance of Small Island States, said. "It’s really tough to see that," he said.
The new financing target is the core tool that global climate talks can deliver to fund projects that reduce planet-warming emissions — such as renewable energy or low-carbon transport. With all countries due to update their national climate targets next year, negotiators fear failure could lead to weaker efforts.
"How are you going to move forward if there's no financing?" said South African climate negotiator Pemy Gasela. Her country is among many developing nations warning they cannot afford to cut emissions faster without more financial support — in South Africa's case, to swap a heavy reliance on CO2-emitting coal for clean energy.
Yet wealthy countries are wary of setting a target too high and risking it going unmet. The missed $100 billion target became politically symbolic in recent UN climate talks, stoking mistrust between nations as developing countries argued the world's economic powers were abandoning them.
Diplomats in Bonn have circled the issue of how much money to put on the table. While countries agree $100bn is too low, there is little chance they would agree to summon the $2.4trn per year that the UN climate chief in February said was needed to keep the world's climate goals within reach.
Neither the EU nor the US have suggested a number for the goal, although both acknowledged this week that it must exceed $100bn. The 27-country EU is currently the biggest provider of climate finance.
The elephant in the negotiation rooms, some diplomats said, is the upcoming US presidential election, in which Donald Trump is seeking to return to office.
The previous Trump administration pulled the world's biggest economy out of the Paris climate agreement. Negotiators said they worry a future Trump administration could halt US climate finance payments, leaving it to other wealthy nations to meet the annual pledge.
India, and a group of Arab countries including Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Egypt, have said the overall financing target should exceed $1trn per year, to reflect the spiralling needs of poorer countries as climate change worsens.
CLIMATE & SUSTAINABILITY HUB