Police surveillance operation to unmask journalistic source ruled unlawful
Lucy Journalists And North/pa Birney (left) Trevor Picture: Barry Mccaffrey
A covert surveillance operation authorised by a Northern Ireland police chief in a bid to unmask a journalistic source was unlawful, a tribunal has ruled.
The Investigatory Powers Tribunal quashed the decision made by former Police Service of Northern Ireland chief constable George Hamilton, to approve the Directed Surveillance Authorisation (DSA) in an investigation into the leaking of a confidential document that appeared in a documentary on a Troubles massacre.
The tribunal, chaired by Lord Justice Singh, also awarded damages of £4,000 (€4,800) each to documentary makers Barry McCaffrey and Trevor Birney, in a judgment issued on Tuesday.
The IPT had been examining allegations that the award-winning journalists were subject to unlawful covert surveillance by UK authorities.
The tribunal also looked at separate allegations that the PSNI and the Metropolitan Police in London unlawfully accessed Mr McCaffrey’s phone data in unrelated operations, in 2013 and 2012 respectively.
The two forces had already conceded that those 2012 and 2013 operations were unlawful.
The tribunal also quashed the two authorisations for those two phone data operations, but did not award any damages to Mr McCaffrey in those cases.
In 2018, Belfast-based Mr McCaffrey and Mr Birney were controversially arrested as part of a police investigation into the alleged leaking of a confidential document that appeared in a documentary they made on the 1994 loyalist paramilitary massacre in Loughinisland, Co Down.
The Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI), citing a conflict of interest, asked Durham Police to lead the investigation into the inclusion of the Police Ombudsman for Northern Ireland document in the No Stone Unturned film on the UVF pub shooting that claimed the lives of six men.
The PSNI later unreservedly apologised for the way the men had been treated and agreed to pay £875,000 (€1m) in damages to the journalists and the film company behind the documentary.
The settlement came after a court ruled that the warrants used by police to search the journalists’ homes and Fine Point Films had been “inappropriate”.
In 2019, Mr Birney and Mr McCaffrey lodged a complaint with the IPT asking it to establish whether there had been any unlawful surveillance of them.
In court proceedings earlier this year, the tribunal heard that a detective requested the DSA from Mr Hamilton in order to monitor whether the two reporters would reach out to their source in the week after their initial release from custody.
Mr Hamilton gave the green light for the covert surveillance of an individual whom officers suspected of being the source of the leaked document from the Police Ombudsman’s office.
In its judgment, the IPT said: “We will quash the DSA. We have determined that a declaration of its unlawfulness would not be sufficient to afford the claimants just satisfaction in respect of its incompatibility with the rights protected by Article 10 (of the European Convention of Human Rights).”
Reacting to the judgment, Mr Birney and Mr McCaffrey both called for a public inquiry into police surveillance of journalists.