Covid articles and social media campaigns drive 50% rise in Press Ombudsman complaints

Covid articles and social media campaigns drive 50% rise in Press Ombudsman complaints

Analysis," Chair Rory Thorough And The Has Objective, Montgomery Of Expert Importance And Has Underlined Press Of Of Council Reporting, Said Informed Ment Well Pandemic The “the

There was a nearly 50% increase in complaints to the Office of the Press Ombudsman last year, largely driven by coverage of the Covid-19 pandemic.

The office considered a total of 527 complaints in 2021, compared to 347 complaints the previous year, with about 200 of last year’s complaints relating to coverage of the pandemic.

Two of the Covid-related complaints were upheld - both around matters of privacy - with five other complaints upheld in other matters.

Of note in the Covid-related complaints was the use of social media campaigns encouraging people to make complaints around specific articles.

Case officer Bernie Grogan notes in the Press Ombudsman's 2021 report, launched today, that "Common to the majority of complaints that were received about Covid-19 articles was that they were the subject of quite a vigorous Facebook campaign by an anonymous Facebook group.

"The Facebook group provided the text of complaints for submission to the Office in respect of a number of articles, and urged followers to submit a complaint to the Press Ombudsman.

"While there is no rule to say that complaints cannot be submitted in such a fashion, there is no benefit to such campaigns, since the Office has a long-established policy, when it receives multiple complaints about one article, to process all of the complaints by the establishment of a ‘lead’ complainant. 

"Multiple complaints submitted via social media campaigns merely clog the efficient and effective operation of the complaints process."

Coverage in national newspapers drew a total of 275 complaints last year.

Chair of the Press Council Rory Montgomery, who took up the position in March this year, said he believed the press had "served Ireland very well in this crisis, at a time when the risks and downsides of over-reliance on social media are really visible.

“The pandemic has underlined the importance of objective, thorough reporting, and of well-informed expert comment and analysis."

The Press Ombudsman

Outgoing Press Ombudsman Peter Feeney.
Outgoing Press Ombudsman Peter Feeney.

The Office of the Press Ombudsman considers complaints about newspapers (print and online), magazines and some online-only publications. It is independent of both government and media.

Member media organisations observe the Press Council’s Code of Practice, which lists 11 principles that in combination, act as a set of standards for responsible publishing. 

Decisions are published on the Press Council's website after the process completes, including a period where either party may appeal an initial decision. 

Publishers are obliged to publish decisions that are upheld against them and may, if they wish, publish those that are not upheld.

Complaints against the Irish Examiner

Recent decisions involving the Irish Examiner have upheld the distinction between opinion pieces and hard news stories.
Recent decisions involving the Irish Examiner have upheld the distinction between opinion pieces and hard news stories.

All five of the most recent complaints against the Irish Examiner were not upheld (including three in 2021 and two so far this year).

An important feature of a number of these recent decisions was to uphold the distinction between opinion pieces and hard news stories, in other words that it is permissable for people to express strong opinions and have those opinions published, even where another person may strongly disagree with that opinion, or find it offensive.

Opinions expressed in such articles should be sincerely held, not motivated by malice and should be underpinned by personal experience and/or evidence. 

They must also be clearly signalled for the reader as opinion pieces. In repeatedly defending complaints about such pieces in the last year, the Irish Examiner has been able to demonstrate that these standards were applied.

The decisions can be read here:

March 2021: Greyhound Action Ireland and the Irish Examiner, regarding a question-and-answer article with a greyhound breeder.

October 2021: Mr Ken Byrne and the Irish Examiner, regarding a news article on Covid numbers.

November 2021: A Person and the Irish Examiner, regarding an opinion article on conversion therapy and hormone-based treatments.

March 2022: Mr Hermann Kelly and the Irish Examiner, regarding an opinion piece on the far right and anti-immigrant rhetoric.

April 2022: An Author and the Irish Examiner, regarding a book review.

More in this section

Cookie Policy Privacy Policy Brand Safety FAQ Help Contact Us Terms and Conditions

© Limited Examiner Echo Group