Were there many other people like Catherine, a woman whose selfless courage had been forgotten at home?
- The Irish in the Resistance. The untold stories of the ordinary heroes who resisted Hitler by Clodagh Finn and John Morgan is published by Gill Books, €19.99
‘AT GIBRALTAR [MARY] BOARDED A FELUCCA WITH A STRONG SMELL OF SARDINES AND AN UNUSUAL HEAD OF STEAM.’ SQUADRON LEADER BERYL E. ESCOTT
October 1944: Colonel Maurice Buckmaster, the head of F Section, received a letter to say that one of his agents, Mary Herbert, had ‘gone to ground good and proper’. Nobody knew where she was, but she was said to be ‘extremely well, in no need of money, and comfortable’. The letter-writer, from the
section’s administration office, went on to say that attempts were being made to get her address, before dropping the bombshell: ‘I was also told that she produced a baby last November!’
Mary Katherine Herbert, courier for the resistance network Scientist, had indeed ‘produced’ a baby. A little girl Claudine (which was also her mother’s fieldname) was in fact born in early December 1943 in a nursing home outside Bordeaux at a time when the Germans had infiltrated several circuits, arresting agents and many of their French contacts. Becoming a new mother in an occupied country in wartime was difficult enough, but Mary Herbert also had to fabricate a new cover story that explained the presence of her baby daughter. And she had to find a place to stay. She made contact with friends in Poitiers and, believing it to be relatively safe, travelled north to stay in the flat of Lise de Baissac, a fellow SOE agent who had recently been called back to London.
Once installed in Lise’s flat, she went to the black market, bought ration books and false identity papers for herself and her infant. She was now Madame Marie-Louise Vernier, a French widow (and new mother) from Alexandria in Egypt.
Then, the unthinkable happened. On 18 February 1944, the Gestapo swept through her apartment block at 19 bis rue Boncenne in the early hours of the morning, arresting several residents, including her. They came to the door while she was feeding her infant. Without giving it a second thought, they separated her from her baby and took her to Gestapo head- quarters in Poitiers. They assumed she was Lise de Baissac. Lise was sister to Claude de Baissac, SOE agent and leader of Scientist circuit, who also happened to be the father of Mary’s baby. Brother and sister had been recalled to London in 1943 after a number of breaches in their respective networks. It turned out that a member of the network had given away the location of several arms dumps and other information that led to the early morning swoop.
While Mary was taken away, her baby was put into the care of French Social Services – although she wasn’t aware of that at the time. In any case, the most pressing issue now was making the Gestapo believe her cover story. Like many SOE recruits, she was a gifted linguist. She spoke French, Italian, Spanish, German and Arabic, which she had learned while studying for a diploma at the University of Cairo before the war. That stood to her as she explained to her interrogators that her ‘queer accent’ in French was because she spoke English, French, Spanish, Italian and Arabic when she was in Egypt. That ‘was enough to upset anyone’s pronunciation’, she said. They continued to question her before putting her into solitary confinement. There was no chair to sit on, only a stone slab that served as a blanket-less bed. She stuck rigidly to her story and was so convincing that the Gestapo released her two months later in April 1944. As she had argued herself, how likely was it that a woman who had just given birth could be an active agent? After her release, she spent a frantic few days trying to track down her baby. She eventually found her, well-cared-for, at a convent orphanage.
After their reunion, she relied on the friends she had made through Lise de Baissac in Poitiers to help her find a safe place to live with her child. She also knew two elderly sisters who arranged for her to hide out on a farm in the countryside outside Poitiers. When Mary Herbert had set out for France some 18 months before, she might have considered the risk of incarceration, but she could hardly have foreseen that she would be jailed just after giving birth. The SOE had contingency plans for myriad eventualities, but motherhood was not one of them. That seems clear from the organisation’s reaction to news of Mary’s baby, the only one born to the 39 female SOE agents in France. Security in F Section didn’t want anything to do with it and, as one document said, it was ‘passing the baby’ on to leader Colonel Buckmaster to ‘clear up’.
It was impossible to predict what might happen on the ground, or how those sent there would deal with it. Mary Herbert had been among the first agents to be trained and sent to France. When she joined the SOE in March 1942, her CV already held a lifetime’s worth of experiences.
Born in Ireland on 1 October 1903 to Ethel (née Rodger) and Brigadier General Edmund Herbert, Mary was very well educated and travelled widely. She studied at the University of Cairo and was a graduate of the Slade School of Fine Art (University College London). In her twenties and thirties, she acted as an escort to orphaned children who were emigrating to Australia. After that, she moved to Poland to work in passport control at the British Embassy in Warsaw. Then, she returned to London to take up a job as a civilian translator at the Air Ministry.
Her ease with languages – she later added Russian to an already-impressive list – meant she was a perfect fit for SOE work. She joined the WAAF in September 1941. Her request to join the SOE was accepted the following March. Squadron leader Beryl E. Escott offered this description: ‘At thirty-nine, she was quite tall (5ft 7in, 1.7m), slim, with short fair hair, pale face and, as far as SOE was concerned, [she had] the gift of being inconspicuous. She was also highly intelligent, patriotic and very religious.’ While her trainers thought she showed promise, they were concerned that she was ‘too fragile for resistance work’.
She proved to be the opposite.