Education Minister Norma Foley is to bring a memo to Cabinet on restricting smartphone use in primary schools, a move that is sure to meet with general approval.
There are ongoing concerns over the impact of smartphones on children’s capacity to pay attention, not to mention the potential for cyberbullying and for exposure to pornography.
On top of those considerations, only yesterday Amnesty International described Tiktok as one platform which “poses danger” to children.
This blunt description is all the more alarming as the Chinese social media giant is targeted specifically at young users.
A closer look at Ms Foley’s memo to Cabinet, however, is a little dispiriting — she is to ask parents to take a “collective decision” not to buy smartphones for children. She has acknowledged that a ban on smartphones cannot be legislated for, and so is seeking an opt-in voluntary approach.
There is an obvious problem here with asking parents to opt into this scheme voluntarily, as it goes without saying that some parents will disregard such proposals and buy their children smartphones anyway. And, as anyone who has ever dealt with primary school-age children knows, if one girl or boy in a classroom has a smartphone, the rest of the class will want one as well.
Even if some way were found to ensure that primary schoolchildren do not use smartphones, there is a further paradox waiting just around the corner.
Secondary schools conduct so much business online now that, from first year onwards, pupils are expected to have immediate online access.
The most obvious way to expedite that is through a smartphone.
There is an essential contradiction here in banning smartphones from primary school children, but relying heavily on smartphones for the same children three months after they leave sixth class. A more effective approach than the opt-in voluntary scheme mentioned above is needed. But, even if such a scheme were adopted in primary schools, it is sadly only deferring potential problems by just a few weeks.