Irish Examiner view: At the very least, defence should have a dedicated minister 

Army’s staffing levels have fallen under 6,000
Irish Examiner view: At the very least, defence should have a dedicated minister 

That Has Learned Picture: Time The First Staffing Farrell/rollingnews We Happened Levels Ie The Have Fallen 6,000 — In Leon On That Under Memory Tuesday Irish Army’s Living

On Tuesday we learned that the Irish army’s staffing levels have fallen under 6,000 — the first time that has happened in living memory.

Up to June 30, the personnel in the army, air corps, and naval service stood at 5,959, 707, and 733, respectively, which means the army has 1,500 fewer soldiers than the absolute minimum it should have.

The deficit can be put down to mathematics — more people are leaving the army than joining. Last year 758 people left the Defence Forces, but only 415 were recruited.

There are other challenges. Levels of pay and working conditions have been criticised for years, with one third of army officers favouring strike action in a recent survey. Also, many of those now leaving the army are non-commissioned officers — sergeants and corporals — which means the army is losing a huge amount of institutional expertise which cannot be easily replaced.

The recent conviction of Cathal Crotty, the soldier who knocked Natasha O’Brien unconscious in Limerick in 2022, has done little for the image of the Defence Forces. Neither did the subsequent revelation that 68 currently serving members of the Defence Forces have been convicted of a crime in the last three years or are currently before the courts.

While staffing numbers in the other branches of the Defence Forces are relatively stable, they also have their issues: The navy has only one ship out on patrol, for instance, due to personnel shortages and mechanical issues.

A recent Politico article labelled Ireland the “ultimate defence freeloader” when it comes to fulfilling our security obligations, which are varied: The recent security review pinpointed specific challenges such as the threat to vital offshore infrastructure from rogue states.

This is a problem without an easy solution. But having defence as a separate ministerial portfolio, not an additional or secondary brief, would be one obvious way to drive reform and improve matters.

Livestream fail tells a tale 

The encounter between Elon Musk and Donald Trump earlier this week was completely in character.

A rambling mess marred by technology problems, it truly reflected the individuals involved. Trump’s credibility was undermined by his own incoherence, while Musk’s standing as a tech expert was sabotaged by a lengthy delay in broadcasting their conversation on X, formerly Twitter.

For many viewers, the surprise came in the dullness of the conversation given the participants’ fondness for outrageous statements. 

Then again, Musk had been put on notice about his legal obligations.

EU industry chief Thierry Breton told Musk in a letter on Monday that he had to comply with EU law in the interview — specifically the Digital Services Act. The act requires large platforms to do more to tackle illegal content and risks to public security, and last month the EU ruled that X had breached that act in a different matter.

In that sense, Musk’s endorsement of Trump’s candidacy may be a double-edged sword. To judge by the performance of X, the former’s business acumen may not be quite the force he likes to project. It may not come be on the radar of the Republican candidate for the US presidency, but this week X was ordered to pay over €550,000 in compensation to a former senior executive at its Irish operations in what is a record award by the Workplace Relations Commission for an unfair dismissal case.

The Musk-Trump conversation does bring into the open the way wealthy individuals seek to influence the democratic process, and there is a similar dynamic with Trump’s running mate J D Vance, who is linked closely to another rightwing tech billionaire, Peter Thiel.

It would be naive to think the rich have not always leveraged their wealth for access to power, but the display of influence we saw this week was repellent in its nakedness.

Democratic candidate Kamala Harris pointed to the weaknesses on show in that display. In a statement, her campaign described Musk and Trump as “self-obsessed rich guys who will sell out the middle class and who cannot run a livestream in the year 2024”.

It is difficult to contradict that characterisation, though loud rebuttals can be expected from both.

Safety of bus and taxi drivers 

The metrics for determining whether our streets are safe or not may vary, but some measurements are more reliable than others.

The dangers facing taxi and bus drivers around Ireland have been articulated plainly in recent weeks. 

Last week we learned of a bus driver on a route in Cork being threatened with serious assault, while a driver in Limerick was shot in the face with an air gun last month.

A taxi driver in Cork suffered severe eye, nose, and mouth injuries being attacked in the city at 3.30am last Sunday; that comes weeks after two separate court cases where men who beat taxi drivers in Cork received suspended sentences.

First, taxi and bus drivers are entitled to work safely, without fear of assault. Their safety is paramount.

Second, if they cannot do so, our cities and towns will struggle, and the general pessimism about our urban centres will only gain momentum.

Having more gardaí on our streets would certainly help. Hopefully some of the gardaí who were sent to Paris to help the French authorities for the Olympics can be redeployed to do a similar job here.

     

More in this section

Cookie Policy Privacy Policy Brand Safety FAQ Help Contact Us Terms and Conditions

Group © Examiner Echo Limited