Let us hope that the photograph of Taoiseach Simon Harris and newly elected British prime minister Keir Starmer clinking their pint glasses of Guinness at the UK leader’s country retreat at Chequers heralds the start of a new era in Anglo-Irish relations.
The early signs are very encouraging. Mr Starmer was said to be “genuinely gobsmacked” when Mr Harris presented him with a Donegal GAA top, a gift that acknowledged the Labour leader’s love of the county and the fact that he spent part of his honeymoon there in 2007.
The contrast between that warm exchange and the silver teapot once presented by former taoiseach Charlie Haughey to British prime minister Margaret Thatcher could not have been more pronounced. If Mrs Thatcher graciously received the gift in 1980, irreconcilable differences between the leaders about the future of Northern Ireland ensured that the rest of tea service was never going to arrive, to quote the joke in political circles at the time.
This time around, the situation looks entirely different. Even before taking office, Mr Starmer promised to repeal and replace the Northern Ireland Troubles (Legacy and Reconciliation) Act 2023, a piece of legislation that had the singular distinction of uniting all parties in opposition to it.
In the same way, there was a cross-party welcome when King Charles announced measures to replace it in his speech at the state opening of parliament on Wednesday. Crucially, he added the words “in consultation with all parties”.
There is still no timeline and the details have yet to be teased out, but Mr Starmer has already shown that he understands the need to provide a real pathway to justice for the people of Northern Ireland.
It also seems clear that he is willing to tackle the tough issues beyond the veneer of soft-focus diplomacy and photo opportunities. Mr Starmer made a point of saying that the Taoiseach was the first world leader he received in his tenure.
It was, he said, symbolic of the importance of a reset in the relationship between Ireland and the UK.
But his actions went beyond symbolism as was evident from a bilateral meeting with Mr Harris on the eve of yesterday’s European Political Community Summit.
During that meeting, Mr Starmer spoke of the “unique and important role” that both leaders shared as co-guarantors of the Good Friday Agreement.
The two leaders agreed to hold annual summits and work together on a range of issues, from Northern Ireland and relationships with the EU to migration and forging closer links.
The Taoiseach was more than heartened by the discussion. “I can’t overstate the significance of this evening’s meeting,” he said of a coming-together that could never have taken place with recent Conservative leaders, from Rishi Sunak to the bombastic Boris Johnson.
At a time when Russian President Vladimir Putin is dialling up the aggression in the East and another Donald Trump presidency looks increasingly likely in the West, it is reassuring to know that the UK’s new leader seems genuinely committed to building relationships and fostering trust with Ireland and Europe.
It is a profoundly depressing sign of our times that we needed to coin the term “sextortion”, a portmanteau word that describes “a form of cyber extortion which involves a threat or blackmail of having intimate information, images or clips shared without consent”, to use the definition on the Garda website.
It is even more disquieting that the number of people seeking support for this shameful crime was one of the most common reasons people contacted the Crime Victim’s Helpline this year.
Sextortion didn’t even feature a few years ago, but figures released yesterday show that it has increased to such an extent that it has changed the demographic of those getting in touch with the service.
Helpline chief executive Michele Puckhaber said staff and volunteers had seen a huge increase in the number of young men looking for information and support. They feel “extreme panic, embarrassment and fear”, she said.
Very often, legislation struggles to keep up with the speed of what is possible online. At least, that is not the case here. There is a media awareness campaign about this despicable form of cybercrime as well as a clearly defined path to prosecution and justice.
If technology has facilitated the rapid rise of such a crime, it has also given us a means to tackle it.
Criminals still have the upper-hand in the digital underworld, though, which means recent calls for legal power to access online messaging services and encrypted communications must be considered if we are to combat crime.