Terence MacSwiney is one of Cork's most celebrated sons, a martyred lord mayor who died in 1920 after 74 days on hunger strike.
A new book
casts fresh light on the ideas that shaped him.Some of his first published works were poetry. Three books of Terence’s verse are reproduced in the volume,
(1907), (1918) as well as (1944), the latter issued posthumously.Neil Buttimer’s introduction to each examines MacSwiney’s motivation for completing them, or, in the case of the third collection, why its editor (Dr BG MacCarthy) compiled that anthology after his death.
HISTORY HUB
If you are interested in this article then no doubt you will enjoy exploring the various history collections and content in our history hub. Check it out HERE and happy reading
His working methods when composing verse or gathering the material together for publication are examined, as are the critical reaction to his writings.
Many of MacSwiney’s poems are lyrical, comprising reflection on family or personal relationships, illuminating his interior life and values.
The greater part is devoted to political topics. Among these are deliberations on conditions in the Ireland of his day, forces governing the country’s circumstances, and how they might be altered for the better.
Quasi-theoretical musings on public affairs were given a particular urgency by day-to-day incidents occurring during the revolutionary period, and various poems capture the intensity of those happenings.
His versifying is a window on the revolution’s emotional as well as intellectual challenges, and a case-study in how poetry embodied those realities.
This section examines the role of verse as an element of contemporary discourse, while looking also at how MacSwiney’s poetic output might be evaluated against that of his peers.
A study of MacSwiney's verse benefits from the survival of vast quantities of his personal papers.
His daughter, Máire, and grandchildren, notably Professor Cathal MacSwiney Brugha, made those documents available generously to Irish institutions, such as Cork Public Museum, the National Library of Ireland, or University College, Dublin, thus facilitating an evaluation of his legacy.
The papers show how carefully he drafted his verse, making multiple changes on grounds of style or content. Those records also reveal which English-language poets he read, the likes of Shelly, Rossetti or Wordsworth, and thus the extent to which late Victorian writing influenced his output.
Critical commentary on what he had composed noted its strong religious dimension, together with the degree to which it reveals lesser-known aspects of his own personal preoccupations, comprising a spread of topics from bereavement to delight in the natural world.
When added to poems by Thomas MacDonagh, Patrick Pearse and other contemporaries, the MacSwiney anthologies are a window into the cultural and intellectual formation of those who participated in the movement for Irish independence, or the country's cultural and intellectual renewal.
The second section of the volume is dedicated to his playwriting career and includes eight of his extant plays (which were completed between 1908 and 1913), six of which are published for the first time.
They introduce MacSwiney as a passionate theatregoer who regularly attended the Cork Opera House productions, and who, at the turn of the 20th century, began to pay close attention to the controversies and debates regarding the ongoing development of Irish theatre, prior to and following the founding of the Abbey Theatre in 1904.
Like his fellow playwright-revolutionaries, including Pearse and MacDonagh, he was fully committed to drama’s influence on encouraging public support for the Irish separatist movement.
The fact that most of the original play texts are in handwritten form probably contributed to the lack of research regarding MacSwiney’s drama.
Yet, as this section confirms, without question, it was his personal ambition to become a full-time writer.
Alongside his great friend Daniel Corkery, he co-founded the Cork Dramatic Society in 1908 and four of his own plays were staged in the city between 1910 and 1912.
The drama section provides in-depth commentaries on, and analyses of, all of his plays, with particular attention paid to what MacSwiney reveals about his own writing in his diaries.
This section also considers his unavailing attempts to continue writing plays after 1914, as well as the posthumous production of the play
by the Abbey Theatre in 1921. This section also considers the on-stage, theatrical productions in Cork and Dublin in 1970, to commemorate the 50th anniversary of MacSwiney’s death.It concludes by imagining his potential pursuit of his playwriting career, had he lived, and, by confirming his actual contributions to Cork theatre’s development, post-1920, a history which most certainly deserves greater attention.
The final section of the book is dedicated to his prose writings. These are arguably the most familiar to students of the period, given that the largest single section (outlining his republican philosophy), which were originally published in article form in the republican journal Irish Freedom between 1910 and 1912, were reproduced, and widely read, after his death as a single volume,
.Less familiar is his journalistic output (he wrote for the journal of the Irish Volunteers, as well as publishing his own short-lived newspaper at the outbreak of the First World War), and his pamphlet commemorating the death in 1915 of Jeremiah O’Donovan Rossa, his great Fenian hero.
While it is difficult to summarise such a large and diverse body of work, one theme dominates above all others.
Perhaps surprisingly, it is not primarily a political idea (though it has clear political overtones), but rather the paramount importance of beauty in the modern world, and in the Ireland of his ambitions.
He passionately believed that separation from Britain was necessary to realise Ireland’s full, beautiful, potential, but was realist enough to appreciate that such separation on its own was no guarantee that the ensuing independence would be put to worthy ends.
For this to be achieved the act of separation itself, the republican campaign, had to be conducted upon the correct, principled, lines — the journey and destination were, in effect, indistinguishable from each other.
It was a tall order, one that arguably out of tune with the realities of revolutionary struggle. But it was an injunction that MacSwiney certainly observed throughout his own life, to its final, awe-inspiring, climax in Brixton Gaol.
is edited by Gabriel Doherty, Fiona Brennan and Neil Buttimer and published by Cork University Press