Simon Coveney’s many years of public service have been rightly recognised in the columns of your paper.
Regarding Eoin English’s report — ‘Owner of Cork property derelict for 21 years again refused permission for redevelopment’ (Irish Examiner, April 4): This is typical of bureaucratic planning nonsense.
By that logic, we’d all still be living in single storey wattle and daub huts. Progress in this day and age means building up to more efficiently use space.
We need to regenerate our towns and cities and this can be most easily accomplished by redeveloping derelict sites.
I’m not a fan of landlords or landlordism, but the city is in desperate need of accommodation and if this man will provide same while also developing a derelict site, what harm?
The comments from the US secretary of state Antony Blinken are truly shocking; he says “humanitarian workers should be protected in Gaza” yet his country is supplying the arms to Israel to make this all happen.
Regarding the hate speech legislation: There are already laws against arson, other damage to property, personal assault, and public disorder.
There is no need for further legislation.
What is needed is political support for An Garda Síochána and courts to apply existing laws.
The right of all Irish residents to receive immediate medical treatment in any EU hospital, public or private, and to be fully refunded by the Irish State, remains a very poorly advertised right.
Shame on all of our public representatives, broadcasters, and health correspondents for failing to ensure that every single person, (forced to wait interminably for treatments), that their wait is totally unnecessary.
Those that cannot afford the upfront cost can have an interest free credit union bridging loan arranged.
Several Irish ‘hand-hold’ facilitators can take patients right through the process.
They receive a fee from treating hospitals. There is no national health service for elective procedures. There is an immediate service available through our EU rights.
Please spread the good news brought to us through our membership of the great European Union.
Jennifer Horgan raises a challenging question in her column — ‘I understand the motive but I’m not sure I agree with cultural boycotts’ (Irish Examiner, April 5).
Is she being snobbish in making a special case for art? What about sport?
The only opinion I will offer is that one cannot make a case for art that could not be made for sport.
Are sporting boycotts a valid form of protest at injustice?
Is there a difference between boycotting groups or individuals that represent their country rather than performing in their individual capacities?
Should Russian athletes be barred from participating in the Olympic Games — even in personal capacities —given Russia’s appalling history of doping?
Should Israeli sportspersons and artists be the subject of boycotts given Israel’s appalling history of persecution of Palestinians in Gaza and the Occupied Territories? What should be done to protest the appalling treatment by Hamas as the government of Gaza of their own people — not to mention of Israelis?
The new leader of Fine Gael, Simon Harris, made some strong comments regarding the ongoing crisis in Gaza at his party’s ard fheis on Saturday night.
Actions are stronger than mere words and if he wants to do something constructive then the Irish State needs to recognise the Palestinian state. Let him do that when the Dàil resumes and he is elected as the new Taoiseach.
On a train journey from Cork to Dublin the “crew cut” look on our hedgerows does not enhance the landscape.
The March to August protection ban on the cutting activity is constantly contravened with permits.
Will we ultimately be without our hawthorn, holly, fuschia, elder trees, furze, blackberry, bilberry, and their generous feeding of humans and wildlife? Is this tidying up an unconscious assault on nature with no sense of the consequences?