Letters to the Editor: Nuclear energy is far from inevitable 

A reader responds to another letter-writer's concerns about nuclear power 
Letters to the Editor: Nuclear energy is far from inevitable 

That Be Would As Better Picture: Accepting Than Istock Inevitability Goals' Power 'genuine A Nuclear Energy An Renewable Pursuing Reader Suggests

Anne Bailey’s alarm about this country needing nuclear energy is unfounded (‘Nuclear power is unavoidable’ — Irish Examiner Letters, March 14). Ireland is rapidly transitioning from fossil fuel to renewable energy.

In 2022, wind produced over a third of Irish electricity. The ESB recently confirmed connection of one gigawatt of solar PV generation to the network: About a fifth of total peak demand, achieved less than two years after Ireland’s first solar farm of a strong pipeline under development, came on-stream.

We’re halfway there already, far surpassing 2008 forecasts.

While solar and wind energy prices have dwindled globally, nuclear electricity prices have been steadily rising.

This country should only go nuclear if it wants: Costs so high they have to be subsidised; multiples of the delays and overruns associated with the National Children’s Hospital; frequent breakdowns of complicated generators; massive (cooling) water wastage and degradation; routine radioactive emissions and leaks; risk of catastrophic civilian, military, or terrorist incidents; and a nation’s guilt about leaving a legacy to future generations of unmanageable nuclear waste, with toxic half-lives of up to millions of years.

The crux is that the EU’s 2023 Complementary Climate Delegated Act (CCDA) designated nuclear energy as sustainable, contrary to recommendations by nature representatives who are appealing this perceived ‘greenwashing’, but in compliance with the powerful nuclear lobby’s quixotic promises. 

Since then, promoters of nuclear energy claiming climate credentials have emerged, campaigning for support in communities.

Despite the common impression that EPAs protect health, they only measure data, to advise policy-makers, who refer information to public health departments. 

Given the nuclear lobby’s superior access to media, curious members of the public may do their own research, consulting more independent groups such as the World Nuclear Energy Status Reports, Beyond Nuclear, Greenpeace, Nuclear Information and Resource Service, Scientists for Global Responsibility, book studies etc.

For less hazard and more pride, I hope the significant momentum seen in reaching genuine renewable energy goals is maintained.

Caroline Hurley, Cloughjordan, Co Tipperary

Wind power hot air

The Government introduced two new energy-related projects recently, both of which are clearly important in Ireland’s quest to achieve climate targets.

Much of the rhetoric however from both Ministers Ryan and Coveney is somewhat fanciful, requiring scrutiny and clarification.

Referring to a 192 MW windfarm in Co Mayo, Mr Ryan says “Ireland is already a global leader for installed onshore wind power capacity”.

This statement however is totally at variance with the facts as detailed daily in the Eirgrid website, (smartgriddashboard.com) and the official EU Wind Europe data (windeurope.org). Ireland has an installed onshore wind capacity of around 5 GW (Gigawatts) and the average daily electricity generated is of the order of 36 GWh (Gigawatt hours).

By contrast, according to today’s Wind Europe data, Denmark generated 122% of its demand from wind, at 134 GWh. Germany generated 702 GWh, the UK 340 GWh, and Spain 240 GWh. Already, all have significant offshore capacity and rapidly developing more, putting Ireland’s lowly comparable status in stark relief.

Referring to the Government strategy for offshore wind, called ‘Powering Prosperity: Ireland’s offshore wind industrial strategy’, the document, for some inexplicable reason, is replete with futile and unattainable aspirations to be global leaders.

Mr Ryan states: “Powering Prosperity sets out how we can also become industry leaders in the deployment of offshore wind.”

Mr Coveney, the minister responsible for the strategy, states: “There is a particular opportunity to establish Ireland as a world leader in floating offshore wind energy”.

In his foreword, he says: “The scale of these targets is a strong
signal of Ireland’s clear potential to become a global leader in offshore renewable energy”. Further, “our potential to provide offshore energy that exceeds our domestic demand positions Ireland at the core of Europe’s renewable energy future”.

Under 3.1.4 Energy policy, “the objective is to explore potential for export of surplus electricity and energy”. This complies with gullible statements made by both Government MEPs and TDs that Ireland will become the Saudi Arabia of wind energy.

Given that offshore wind development is today facing many difficulties, coupled with Ireland’s abject failure to achieve 2020 emissions targets, as well the certainty that we will miss 2025 and 2030 commitments, the Coalition would be wise to heed the advice of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change to achieve what’s possible, and ditch the grandiose unattainable global targets.

John Leahy, Wilton, Cork

Killing of an eagle

It is truly tragic that a rare white-tailed eagle has become the latest victim of shooting in Ireland.

From flying majestically across the sky to being reduced to a lifeless lump on the ground, this poor bird had the misfortune of ending up in a country where gunning down threatened creatures is not uncommon.

The minister of State for nature, Malcolm Noonan, expressed his devastation at the illegal killing of the eagle, saying: “To think that one would be shot is unconscionable.”

This same minister allows the recreational shooting of other red-list birds of highest conservation concern, namely snipe, golden plover, shoveler, red grouse, and woodcock.

In a deepening biodiversity crisis, it should be considered unconscionable to kill any species. The open season must be permanently closed and a dedicated animal crime unit established to hunt down those destroying our wildlife heritage.

Philip Kiernan, Irish Council Against Blood Sports, Mullingar, Co Westmeath

Despair in Dublin

One hopes St Patrick did not visit our capital city these past days. If he had, he would have quickly identified with so many other foreign-sounding names in our midst and be saddened to his core.

On walking through Mount St, he would have observed the many tens of tented migrants and the face-
saving scurry, as our national day approached, to move them on. The sights and smells would have had the nightmare of his own trafficking here, his being forced into slavery and being dehumanised such that he had to eat and sleep alongside the animals in his charge, starkly revisited upon him.

He would have been distressed and mortified to behold the Irish ‘nation’ at home and abroad celebrate him as our national saint and promote him universally as the focus and heartbeat of what it is to be Irish while so many amongst us live in the homeless misery of his first coming here 16 centuries ago.

He would have expected so much better.

Michael Gannon, Saint Thomas Sq, Kilkenny City

Coping with dope

One year from now, will marijuana be legal in Ireland?

American vice president Kamala Harris has been saying how marijuana should be legal at the federal level — something both Democrat and Republican voters agree with.

If an American administration did indeed say it was going to legalise marijuana, the question becomes how soon Ireland would do the same, and indeed whether Ireland would pass such a law before the US did?

The Examiner would have fewer crimes and court cases to report on.

Frank Desmond, Evergreen Rd, Cork

Papal appeasement

I read Nick Folley’s excellent letter in reply to mine with great interest ‘Unhistorical slander’ (Irish Examiner, Letters, March 18).

The Vatican’s approach to fascism in the 1930s was, as Mr Folley eloquently explains, moderated by vulnerability, the need for self-preservation, and a pragmatic tradition of diplomacy. All I can say to Mr Folley is this: Only one of these qualities lights up the pages of our Christian New Testament. 

The relevant histories are there for anyone to read — including parts of the Bible. Alas, snug somnambulant deals with fascists like the Vatican’s Concordat with Hitler and Mussolini were unavailable to the Jews, people with disabilities, homosexuals, the Roma, the Poles, and the Slavs. 

What Mr Folley describes was a “compromise” with evil made and conducted under the swishing soutane of sleek and rarefied “diplomacy”.

Pope Francis’s apparent willingness to appease Vladimir Putin as he invades and occupies Ukraine is as presumptuous as it is unhelpful. They are fighting for their lives and for freedom from tyranny. 

I hope that we would do the same. It is all very well to prescribe the white flag from the white smoke of a distant and opulent museum. 

But, as the New York Yankees Hall of Famer Yogi Berra once famously said: “It’s dèja vu all over again.”

Michael Deasy, Bandon, Co Cork

   

CLIMATE & SUSTAINABILITY HUB

More in this section

Cookie Policy Privacy Policy Brand Safety FAQ Help Contact Us Terms and Conditions

© Limited Examiner Group Echo