Department of Finance officials said that even a targeted relief should be avoided on “the grounds of fairness” and that, if it were to be introduced, it could be very complex to implement and operate.
“While we acknowledge that a small cohort of mortgage holders, particularly those with non-banks have been effected by rising mortgage interest rates, it does not appear feasible to provide financial assistance to such a group through the tax system,” the submission said.
However, Mr McGrath was determined that at the very least inquiries were made with Revenue about how the worst-hit householders could be helped.
In a note, he wrote: “I would view such an intervention as being time bound and exceptional in nature, and much less costly than introducing mortgage interest relief generally.
“Please do explore these points, engage with Revenue on the practicalities involved and revert in due course.”
In later submissions closer to the budget, department officials provided more detail on two options that had been requested by Mr McGrath but remained vehemently opposed to the introduction of any measure.
One of the submissions said: “As previously advised the department is strongly of the view that the mortgage interest relief is not the best policy approach as it is directly contrary to the monetary policy stance, could further increase or prolong high inflation, runs counter to established international research and gives rise to deadweight.”
It also said there were “fundamental flaws inherent” in both options but that it was feasible that either could be legislated for and in place by 2024.
The concerns of the Central Bank were also detailed in the submissions. They had said it would be extremely difficult to target at those most in need and that it was likely relief would end up being given to people from “higher ends of the household income distribution” as well.
A submission explained: “Support for mortgage holders through tax relief, in instances where borrowers’ repayment capacity is not in fact under stress, represents a deadweight loss to the taxpayer, as well as risking pro-cyclical contribution to aggregate demand at a time of high inflation.”
Their analysis had also found that among those most likely to benefit were people who had long benefited from low tracker rates, who were over 50 years of age, and owed less on average than other borrowers.
The Central Bank said the department should try to find a solution through the social welfare system instead so that the people in most financial difficulty could benefit.